<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defraggler Beta: Defrag Selected Individual Files &#038; Folders on Windows Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkabdul.com/2007/10/10/defraggler-beta-defrag-selected-individual-files-folders-on-windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkabdul.com/2007/10/10/defraggler-beta-defrag-selected-individual-files-folders-on-windows-vista/</link>
	<description>The Latest in Computers, Mobiles and Internet Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WillBau</title>
		<link>http://thinkabdul.com/2007/10/10/defraggler-beta-defrag-selected-individual-files-folders-on-windows-vista/#comment-266669</link>
		<dc:creator>WillBau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkabdul.com/2007/10/10/defraggler-beta-defrag-selected-individual-files-folders-on-windows-vista/#comment-266669</guid>
		<description>Defraggler is good, but I found that it leaves alot of files untouched.. I set it to be aggressive, yet it returns notice that some files were not defragged... and on my system that turned out to be about 13.. Not worth the time if it cannot do all the files, and do them in a timely, efficient manner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defraggler is good, but I found that it leaves alot of files untouched.. I set it to be aggressive, yet it returns notice that some files were not defragged&#8230; and on my system that turned out to be about 13.. Not worth the time if it cannot do all the files, and do them in a timely, efficient manner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
